Talley,
M., Urada, L., Jones, J. (2005). An MSW field unit for
pre-emancipated foster youth: Design and development
innovations.
Presented at the Council on Social Work
Education Conference, 2005. UCLA
Center
on Child Welfare.
A
program for pre-emancipating foster youth supportively through
interdependent networking program is a joint project of a child
protective services' (CPS) agency and a university-based center
on child welfare in a major metropolitan city. The program: 1)
addresses the permanency needs of at-risk foster youth (ages
13-15) through different avenues: finding permanent homes and
mentors, while concurrently preparing them with pre-emancipation
skills in case they age out of foster care, 2) supports future
participation in Independent Living Programs (ILP), and 3)
trains MSW students in innovative macro and micro social work
interventions for pre-emancipated foster youth. The program
models Rothman and Thomas' (1994) six stages of "Design and
Development" (D&D): problem analysis and project planning,
information gathering and synthesis, design, early development
and pilot testing, evaluation and advanced development, and
dissemination.
Literature
review. The
1999 Foster Care Independence Act and the 1997Adoption and Safe
Families Act require states to focus on child well-being,
safety, and permanence outcomes. Studies show that emancipated
foster youth have problems with money, obtaining medical care,
relationships with family, physical victimization,
incarceration, and homelessness after leaving care. (Courtney,
et al., 2001) Youth had limited educational attainments, low
reading scores, special education classes, depression, anxiety,
anger expressed through physical violence, and illegal substance
use. (Shin et al, 2002) Socialization, cultural, or recreational
services for foster youth before emancipation were not offered
despite 44% of youth diagnosed with at least one disability and
17 percent attempting suicide. (Loman, et al, 2000). Less than
one-third of foster care programs in a study offered vocational
training or computer classes. (Sheehy, et al, 2001) Suggestions
were: helping youth establish a relationship with a mentor who
can provide support after emancipation; helping youth resolve
issues with their family of origin; integrating youth
development philosophies into services; and increasing services
in the areas of vocational training, computer training, and
long-term educational goals. (Sheehy, et al, 2001) The
pre-emancipating adolescents program described in this
abstract addresses each of these issues through early
intervention. It is a model being discussed for replication
throughout the county.
The
innovation. The
pre-emancipating adolescents program is unique in the nation
because it is cost-effective, gives individualized pre-ILP
services for youth and their families, and involves community
collaboration.
Approximately thirty youth voluntarily engage in weekly
therapeutic groups, outings, and intensive individual and family
clinical case management for up to three years, until they reach
16 years old. A CPS
Field Instructor, university Field Consultant, and eight MSW
students staff the unit.
The
MSW students in the program integrate their academic knowledge
(public child welfare and social work principles) into their
field placement by applying micro and macro skills. On a micro
level, interns apply a variety of individual and group
techniques such as clinical case management, bio-psychosocial
assessment, psychodynamic, cognitive behavioral, individual,
family, and psycho-educational group therapy, modeling, behavior
reinforcement, journaling, art therapy techniques, and crisis
intervention. Youth improve interpersonal skills and
communication with peers, caregivers, and teachers, and learn
anger management, budgeting, goal setting, and career planning.
On a
macro level, MSW students design weekly youth group curricula
with youth input. Group topics, community speakers, and cultural
and recreational outings help interns and youth network with
community leaders and former foster youth, and learn about
issues such as STDs, leadership, gang prevention, community
service, and social skills. Youth learn computer, writing, and
art skills through completion of quarterly newsletters.
The
MSW interns established a mentoring program for foster youth for
which they recruit mentors (creating a recruitment database of
organizations), design and deliver trainings, and monitor
matches. They are leaders in a consortium of organizations with
mentor programs for foster youth.
Interns
also engage in annual program evaluation, gathering baseline
data and feedback from the youth through structured surveys. In
response to a request by the child protective agency, a
longitudinal study was designed and is undergoing approval to
determine whether program interventions increase the quality of
life of pre- and post-emancipated youth in four areas: 1)
improved academic grades/conduct, 2) increased placement
stability/quality, 3) increased support from adult substitute
support (mentors), and 4) increased tangible and intangible
skills that enhance their success after emancipation. The study
will track graduates of the program through high school and a
year beyond emancipation and compares outcomes with a comparison
group.
Through
weekly client contacts and MSW curriculum integration, the
program has increased child safety, permanence, and well-being
of clients. Specifically, the program facilitates recommended
changes (an essential part of D&D) in how interventions and
services are delivered to pre-emancipated foster
youth.
References
Ansell,
D., P. Correia III, R. Copeland, A. M. Sheehy, Jr., E. Oldham,
and M. Zanghi.
(2000). Promising Practices: Supporting Transition of
Youth Served by the Foster Care System. Edmund Muskie School of Public Services, National
Resource Center for Youth Services,
and the Annie E. Casey Foundation.
Brandford,
C. & English, D. (2004). Foster youth transition to
independence study.
Seattle,
WA: Office of Children's
Administration Research,
Washington
Department of
Social and Health Services
Connell,
C.M., Katz, K.H., Saunders, L., Kraemer Tebes, J. (2006).
Leaving foster care- the influence of child and case
characteristics on foster care exit rates. Children and Youth
Services Review, 28, 780-798.
Courtney,
M. E.; Piliavin, I.;
Grogan-Kaylor, A.; Nesmith, A. (2001). Foster Youth Transitions to
Adulthood: A Longitudinal View of Youth Leaving Care.
Wisconsin
Univ., Madison.
Institute for Research on Poverty, Child Welfare League of
America,
Washington,
DC. Child Welfare,
80(6)685-717.
English,
A. and Grasso, K. (2000). The Foster Care
Independence
Act of 1999:
Enhancing Youth Access to Health Care. Clearinghouse
Review/Journal of Poverty Law and Policy, 34: 217-232.
Loman,
L.A.; Siegel, G.L. (2000). An Evaluation of Independent
Living Services in Ohio. A Final Report.
Institute of Applied Research, St. Louis, MO. , 151 pp.
Nollan,
K. A.;Wolf, M.;Ansell, D.;Burns, J..et al.(2000). Ready or Not:
Assessing Youths' Preparedness for Independent Living. Casey
Family Program, Seattle, WA., Child Welfare, 79(2)159-176.
Rothman,
J. and Thomas, E. (Eds.) (1994). Intervention Research: Design
and Development for Human Services. New York: Haworth.
Sheehy,
Jr., A. M.;Oldham, E.;Zanghi, M.;Ansell, D., et al. (2001). Promising Practices:
Supporting Transition of Youth Served by the Foster Care System,
Technical Report. Oklahoma Univ., College of Continuing
Education, Tulsa, OK, National Resource Center for Youth
Services, Annie E. Casey Foundation, Baltimore, MD, Edmund S.
Muskie School of Public Service, Portland, ME, 107
pp.
Shin,
Hyucksun Sunny; Poertner, John (2002). The well-being of older
youth in out-of-home care who are headed to independence.
Technical Report, University of Illinois. School of Social
Work, Children and
Family Research Center, Urbana, IL, 65 pp.